Hi Benjamin, thanks for sharing your thoughts and welcome to the forum!
I understand the intention and scope of the anonymous aspect a bit differently. The intention, I believe, is not about having written references posted anonymously. Anonymity would be quite impossible to achieve like that, at least to the people involved. And that’s the kind of anonymity we are aiming at: enabling users to call on negative experiences, even when they wouldn’t want to write about it (and reveal themselves, just as you point out as well). So the anonymous aspect is mostly about making the written reference independent from leaving a quantified feedback (by selecting values on a scale or ticking choices). And then processing this feedback in a way so that it’s not directly traceable to a particular user either.
From it’s scope, it’s not directly related to reporting, as it would only visualize collective opinions. There could be consequences, if a certain aggregated threshold is reached, but reporting a serious single incident should be an entirely distinct matter to leaving a reference. I’m not aware that there’s already concrete ideas sketched out, who exactly would act on reports and which guidelines they would follow. But there is a topic on reporting already, so if you have more ideas on it, please share them in Reporting and Moderation!